The El Dorado Lynx returned to the top of the Plante Conference after last year’s 5th place finish, while the Charleston Chiefs — who previously topped the conference — securing the second bye. In the Sawchuk, the Adirondack Aces — just two years removed from back-to-back championships — had a spectacular fourth quarter (16-2-0 and 9-0-0 on the road) to seal the top seed and first overall in the league, while Farmington put together a nice comeback campaign to finish second and take the other bye.
That leaves eight teams vying for a spot in the second round. Here’s what those series hold:
(3) Great Lakes Pilots (43-27-12) vs. (6) Baltimore Crab (36-34-12)
Head-to-head record: Great Lakes won 3-1-2
Top scorers:
GLP: Bouchard (81, 29-69-98), Raymond (82, 36-48-84), Bedard (68, 30-53-83), Dahlin (81, 30-53-83)
BAL: Crosby (82, 43-77-120), Forsberg (82, 52-60-112), Marchessault (82, 49-42-91), Makar (77, 17-73-90)
Goaltenders:
BAL: Luukkonen (37, 3.25, .907), Vejmelka (30, 3.46, .891)
GLP: Demko (51, 3.24, .908), Levi (14, 4.13, .883)
The Pilots are the feel-good story of the season, as the team, with first overall pick Connor Bedard leading the way, finally emerged after several seasons in the basement. The Crab — led by Sidney Crosby, Filip Forsberg, and Cale Makar — are no slouches, but they’re coming into the postseason on a cold streak after having gone 4-10-4 in the fourth quarter. The regular season contests between these two teams featured several offensive slugfests with scores like 7-4, 6-6, 9-5, and 7-6, although it bears noting that Baltimore (which finished the season with five 30-goal scorers) won none of those. Indeed, Great Lakes scored more goals than any other Plante team this year. We’ll see if that continues in the postseason.
(4) Pittsburgh Hornets (39-35-8) vs. (5) South Side Renegades (38-36-8)
Head-to-head record: South Side won 4-2-0
Top scorers:
PIT: Robertson (82, 42-50-92), Hughes (82, 24-65-89), Malkin (82, 26-59-85), Coyle (82, 34-42-76)
SSR: Tkachuk (81, 38-43-81), Teravainen (76, 25-51-76), Larkin (68, 28-37-65), Hischier (71, 35-27-62)
Goaltenders:
PIT: Swayman (35, 2.91, .897), Vasilevskiy (27, 4.01, .883)
SSR: Hellebuyck (60, 2.91, .912), Woll (22, 3.88, .875)
The Hornets are coming off a trip to the Atkinson Cup Final while the Renegades are back in the postseason after missing the cut last year, but as far as 2024-25 is concerned, these two clubs seem like a fairly even match. Pittsburgh has the higher-powered offense, and outside of maybe Brady Tkachuk no one on the South Side roster can bring the firepower to match the Hornets’ Jason Robertson and Quinn Hughes. What makes this series intriguing is Pittsburgh’s penchant for pucks on net — they had by far the biggest shot differential in the league, a whopping +10.4/game, and averaged 41.8 shots for — while at the other end, the Renegades’ Connor Hellebuyck is coming off a magnificent regular season, including 8 shutouts. There’s upset potential here, but it 100% depends on Hellebuyck standing on his head.
(3) San Jose Hosers (49-26-7) vs. (6) Ice Harbor Storm (37-42-3)
Head-to-head record: SJH won 3-2-1
Top scorers:
SJH: Stamkos (79, 63-54-117), Marner (69, 46-63-109), Tavares (80, 40-52-92), Gostisbehere (81, 21-50-71)
IHS: Reinhart (82, 95-39-134), Barkov (73, 27-106-133), DeBrincat (82, 44-71-115), Matheson (82, 11-67-78)
Goaltenders:
SJH: Shesterkin (55, 3.41, .908), Forsberg (28, 5.02, .857)
IHS: Gibson (44, 4.20, .873), Ullmark (38, 3.59, .901)
For San Jose, this post-championship campaign was eerily similar to last — they managed just one fewer win but still finished higher in the standings than in 2023-24. Steven Stamkos’ 63 goals were somehow only good for fourth league-wide, but with Mitch Marner, John Tavares, great defensive depth, and Igor Shesterkin turning in a pretty good season, this is a team that is clearly poised to make another run. By comparison, the Storm — who are the only team to make the playoffs with a sub-.500 record, one year after leading the conference — had the most deadly forward duo in the entire league, with 95-goal man Sam Reinhart next to Aleksander Barkov and his 106 assists, and decent depth behind them. Where the Storm get into trouble is in net: John Gibson was very shaky this year. While Linus Ullmark was better, he’s just shy of meeting the threshold that would make him eligible to play all of the series’ games. That means Ice Harbor must start Gibson for at least three games in a seven-game series and that could be Ice Harbor’s undoing against San Jose’s offense and the third best powerplay in the league.
(4) West Virginia River Rats (46-29-7) vs. (5) Boston Banshees (40-35-7)
Head-to-head record: WVR wins 3-2-1
Top scorers:
WVR: Draisaitl (82, 42-77-119), Ehlers (82, 39-60-99), Aho (78, 29-51-80), Guentzel (66, 27-48-75)
BOS: Thomas (82, 24-65-89), Josi (82, 12-62-74), Pavelski (82, 27-33-60), Thompson (71, 36-20-56)
Goaltenders:
WVR: Saros (62, 3.88, .885), Primeau (22, 3.11, .905)
BOS: Sorokin (45, 3.77, .886), Brossoit (23, 3.42, .903), Annunen (14, 2.34, .931)
These teams haven’t faced each other since the second quarter (and the Banshees had a very rough start to the year before finding their game) so Boston’s midseason pickup of Roman Josi adds an interesting wrinkle to a fairly even matchup. The defenseman put up 56 points in 42 games in his half-season with Boston, but he’ll have his hands full with West Virginia’s skaters, as Leon Draisaitl, Sebastian Aho, Jack Hughes & co. give the Rats one of the league’s most dangerous lineups from top to bottom. Even winger Owen Tippett chipped in a sneaky 40 goals. Neither team’s starting netminder had good years, and we may even see Boston platoon Laurent Brossoit and Justus Annunen for a few games to try to counter the bigger guns on the Rats; that could change the complexion of a close series, especially if West Virginia’s Juuse Saros continues to struggle at the other end. West Virginia was also tied for the second-worst penalty killing percentage during the regular season (78.5%) — Boston’s PP was just average, but that too could be something to watch.
